I've been busy trying to finish my final project for library school so I can get my degree. This is why I haven't posted for a long while. I will soon have an MLIS degree. Please be patient with me.
The publisher of The Beauty Queen of Jerusalem by Sarit Yishai-Levi contacted me about reviewing this book for Book Babe. I was disinclined to read a book about a beauty queen, but the author is Israeli so I looked beyond the title. I discovered that it's a family saga that partly deals with the period before Israel was a state. My grandmother, who was born in what was then the Ottoman Empire in 1905, spent her childhood in Jerusalem. So I'm always interested in learning more about the history of Jews in what would later be known as Israel. I agreed to review it and received an ARC via Net Galley in return for this honest review.
I have to admit that Luna, the title character, was unsympathetic. I found her self-absorbed and superficial. She always wanted to be the center of attention. Her sister Rachelika thought that love redeemed Luna. I disagree since she spent so much of her life acting like a spoiled brat. I thought that Luna's mother, Rosa, was the strongest woman in this book. This is by no means a feminist narrative. Rosa was married into the Hermosa family without her consent as was typical during that period. Marriages were usually arranged then. The reason why I call Rosa strong is because she survived the loss of her parents at a young age and always did what needed to be done under challenging circumstances. Luna didn't respect her mother because she cleaned the homes of British occupiers for a living before she married. Luna's attitude toward her mother definitely didn't endear her to me. I thought Rosa was doing the best she could to keep herself and her younger brother alive without assistance from anyone else.
The Hermosa family, which is at the center of the narrative, originally came to Palestine from Spain when the Jews were expelled by Ferdinand and Isabella in 1492. This community of Jews are known as Sephardim because they came from Sepharad which is the Hebrew word for Spain. They spoke Ladino which is a mixture of Spanish and Hebrew. They were proud of their roots in the land and their ability to co-exist with Arabs. Later settlers in Palestine came from Eastern Europe and were known as Ashkenazis. I am descended from Ashkenazi Jews.
I was interested in reading about the customs of the Sephardic Jews as described in this novel. There were some that seemed alien to me. This is especially true of the idea of selling your infant children to a neighbor and even calling them "slaves" in order to fool the demon Lilith who was supposed to kidnap children. Lilith was imported from Zoroastrianism during the Jewish exile to Babylon. The ancient Persians believed in a type of demon called the Lilitu. Feminist Jews have a different version of Lilith as a truly admirable figure. The feminist version is derived from a Jewish folkloric tale in which Lilith was Adam's first wife who refused to be dominated by him. I would think that the feminist version of Lilith would want to free children who'd been sold as slaves. Although the children were bought back by their families of origin a few weeks later, I find this practice extremely repulsive.
The theme of conflict between Sephardi Jews and Ashkenazi Jews was important to this book. I thought that if there was a curse on the Hermosa family as Luna thought, then the curse was prejudice against Ashkenazim. Yet as Ashkenazim became more powerful, they began to discriminate against Sephardim. This pattern of Ashkenazi discrimination against Sephardi Jews continued in modern Israel.
Another aspect of The Beauty Queen of Jerusalem that interested me was the theme of terrorism and how it's portrayed. It's often said that one person's terrorist is another person's freedom fighter. I tend to draw the line at the victimizing of innocent civilians. So did Gabriel, Luna's father. He had no interest in supporting terrorists even if the terrorists were Jews. There is a character in this book who joined a terrorist organization engaged in actions against the British occupiers. There were other characters who were sympathetic to such actions. Terrorists and their supporters tend to believe that the ends justify the means. Even if I am sympathetic toward the goals of terrorists, I believe that innocent blood on their hands will taint their cause, and that Gandhi's non-violent approach is a better model for freedom fighters. Yet I am glad that the author of this novel portrayed a spectrum of viewpoints on this issue.
I have to say that the characters I really loved in this novel were Gabriel and Luna's husband, David. They weren't saints, but they were men who were committed to doing the best they could for their families. I appreciated their sense of responsibility, just as I respected Rosa's endurance. Rosa, Gabriel and David gave The Beauty Queen of Jerusalem stature and pathos.
Showing posts with label Israel. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Israel. Show all posts
Saturday, April 2, 2016
Wednesday, June 10, 2015
Saying Goodbye To Warsaw by Michael Cargill
What I liked most about this book was Alenka, a character who appeared late in the novel. She was spirited, resourceful and optimistic in a situation that left little room for optimism. She played an important role in Cargill's version of the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising. I also found her believable unlike the nine year old protagonist, Abigail.
Another review said that Abigail became unbelievable only toward the end of the book during the uprising. I disagree. I think she was always too good to be true. She had no flaws other than being young and innocent which was too temporary in her horrifying environment to be a real flaw. All the children in the Warsaw Ghetto had to grow up in a hurry. Abigail became much more seriously unbelievable toward the end of the book. She not only acquired skills too quickly, she was better at them than anyone else. Credibility went out the window.
I should state at this point that I took a course on the Holocaust from the Jewish Theological Seminary. One of the books I read in that course was The Theory and Practice of Hell by Eugen Kogen who was a political prisoner in Buchenwald. I am mentioning this so that readers are aware that I have also read books from the perspective of non-Jewish Holocaust victims.
Kogen's book shows that the Nazis were quite rigorous about separating non-Jewish prisoners from Jewish prisoners. The Nuremberg Laws actually required them to make sure that Jews had no contact with other types of prisoners. They were afraid of "race pollution". Separation of Jews from non-Jews was also the main reason for their establishment of Jewish ghettos like the one in Warsaw. So they wouldn't have deliberately sent someone who was legally non-Jewish to a Jewish ghetto. From the Jewish perspective, they did send quite a number of non-Jews to Jewish ghettos. This is because the definition of who is a Jew according to Jewish law was more restrictive than the Nuremberg Laws.
I am bringing up this issue because there is a character in this book who was sent to the Warsaw Ghetto even though he was non-Jewish. This may seem like a minor point to other readers. He was portrayed very movingly and I liked the role he played in the novel, but it bothered me that the author didn't understand something very basic about the Nazi mindset.
Cargill also mentions Israel a few times. Israel didn't exist until 1948 which was after WWII. There is a statement made by a character in this novel that the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising was partly funded by "our friends in Israel". This is highly improbable. At the time, Jews in America were sending funds to Palestine to help with the struggle of Jewish settlers against the British Mandate. For more information see the article on the Jewish Insurgency in Palestine on Wikipedia.
I'm picky about the historical details discussed above because they matter to me. They probably wouldn't even be noticed by many readers.
From a storytelling perspective, I thought that Saying Goodbye To Warsaw was well-plotted and well-paced. I also liked the final scene. It affirms the centrality and sacredness of family. In the end, family is what matters most.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)