When the Goodreads group Historical Fictionistas decided to allow authors that are active members of the group to nominate their own novels for the March Book of the Month, it had been some time since they had last allowed author members to do this. The normal rule of the group is that authors can't nominate their own books. This is a common rule among Goodreads groups.
I was delighted when Kate Braithwaite nominated her Nellie Bly novel, The Girl Puzzle. I quickly seconded the nomination, and it won. I had already purchased it on Amazon a while back, but hadn't had an opportunity to get to it. It's nice to be able to read more historical fiction with strong woman protagonists during Women's History Month. This means I can provide more reviews than usual for Flying High Reviews.
I had actually read a novel focusing on patients at the asylum where journalist Nellie Bly did a ten day undercover investigation pretending to have amnesia in 1887. That book was A Different Kind of Angel by Paulette Mahurin. It was the best historical fiction that I read in 2018 and I reviewed it here.
The asylum was located on what was then called Blackwell's Island which is in New York's East River. It was re-named Roosevelt Island in 1973. If you're interested in more information about the island's history, see its Wikipedia article here.
In comparing the two books I've read dealing with this late 19th century asylum, I feel that Mahurin's novel was very different in its orientation toward the patients. The fictional protagonist in A Different Kind of Angel was a refugee who was committed to that institution for not being able to speak English. She clearly didn't belong there. She encountered other patients who were also unjustly consigned to the asylum. This protagonist brought definitions of "sanity" into question. In The Girl Puzzle, Nellie Bly thought that a couple of patients didn't belong there, but the behavior of one patient and the history of the other caused Nellie to doubt her judgment. So it was unclear whether any of these women were committed without justification. It seemed to me that Braithwaite was coming down on the side of compassionate Dr. Ingram who said it was "a complicated issue". This positively portrayed asylum staff member commented to Nellie that patients could appear sane when they weren't.
It's important for me to add that all the rest of the asylum staff other than Dr. Ingram were portrayed by Braithwaite as either extremely abusive, or arrogant and uncaring. In her author's note called "Fact and Fiction in The Girl Puzzle" she reveals that the staff shown in her novel are all real individuals given their actual names, and that their behavior toward the patients is based on fact. There was a grand jury investigation of this institution after the Nellie Bly exposé , and this too is in the public record.
Another aspect of The Girl Puzzle that makes it dis-similar to A Different Kind of Angel is that it's dual period. There is a narrator in Braithwaite's book who was Nellie Bly's secretary toward the end of her life. This narrative displays the elderly Nellie Bly as having poor judgment. Nellie Bly's secretary admired her employer for her courage and past achievements, but she acknowledged that this feminist heroine had flaws. In the 1887 narrative, Nellie Bly herself experienced moments of angst in which she wondered if she had taken too great a risk when she accepted her undercover assignment.
I would consider Braithwaite's approach to her protagonist realistic. She shows us a Nellie Bly who is strong when the situation calls for it, but is also very human. This makes The Girl Puzzle vastly superior to a Nellie Bly mystery that I DNFed because she never doubted herself , and kept on repeating the same errors. Mystery fans call such characters TSTL (Too Stupid To Live). That's why I recommend this novel by Braithwaite to readers who want believable female protagonists.
Showing posts with label 20th Century. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 20th Century. Show all posts
Saturday, March 14, 2020
Wednesday, September 11, 2019
Nexus: How Does A Strong Woman Deal With A Broken Man?
Nexus is a novella in the alternate history Roma Nova series by Alison Morton in which there is a matriarchal country whose citizens are the descendants of Pagan Romans that left Rome in ancient times. See my reviews of previous Roma Nova books Inceptio, Carina and Perfiditas which focus on the altered 21st century adventures of the maverick praetorian, Carina. The protagonist of Nexus is Carina's formidable grandmother, Aurelia. It takes place in the alternate 20th century between Aurelia and Insurrectio. My reviews of these Aurelia books are at the links I've provided. You can also find my review of Retalio, the sequel of Insurrectio on this blog here. The most recent book in this series that I've reviewed is Roma Nova Extra, an anthology of short stories taking place during a variety of historical periods.
Let's move on to the current review. Since Aurelia is my favorite of the two Roma Nova novel protagonists, I was delighted to be in her company again. This time it was in the newly written 1970's adventure, Nexus, provided by Alison Morton in advance of publication.
I'd like to emphasize that all the Roma Nova books are heavily plotted thrillers, but characterization is also an aspect of these books. Aurelia investigates a series of crimes in Nexus. Yet I feel that the central theme of this novella is character centered.
The broken man appears in several Roma Nova books. He's especially heart-wrenching to deal with when a protagonist has fallen in love with him. Yet there are other circumstances that may make a strong woman want to fix him. If he's young, she may feel protective toward him. Aurelia finds herself in this situation in Nexus.
Aurelia is a compassionate human being. People who run rough shod over others are usually insecure. It's only individuals who have a strong sense of themselves like Aurelia who can afford to be compassionate. This is a character trait that she shares with Miklos, the man she loves. Miklos and Aurelia's relationship with him play an important role in Nexus. Aurelia's choice of Miklos and the kind of relationship she has with him is another reason why I prefer her as a protagonist. I really like that Aurelia and Miklos respect each other's independence, and share the same values.
The ending of Nexus is tragic, but there is also a redemptive aspect that made it feel emotionally satisfying. I hope that Alison Morton will find other opportunities to write more Aurelia prequels.
Let's move on to the current review. Since Aurelia is my favorite of the two Roma Nova novel protagonists, I was delighted to be in her company again. This time it was in the newly written 1970's adventure, Nexus, provided by Alison Morton in advance of publication.
I'd like to emphasize that all the Roma Nova books are heavily plotted thrillers, but characterization is also an aspect of these books. Aurelia investigates a series of crimes in Nexus. Yet I feel that the central theme of this novella is character centered.
The broken man appears in several Roma Nova books. He's especially heart-wrenching to deal with when a protagonist has fallen in love with him. Yet there are other circumstances that may make a strong woman want to fix him. If he's young, she may feel protective toward him. Aurelia finds herself in this situation in Nexus.
Aurelia is a compassionate human being. People who run rough shod over others are usually insecure. It's only individuals who have a strong sense of themselves like Aurelia who can afford to be compassionate. This is a character trait that she shares with Miklos, the man she loves. Miklos and Aurelia's relationship with him play an important role in Nexus. Aurelia's choice of Miklos and the kind of relationship she has with him is another reason why I prefer her as a protagonist. I really like that Aurelia and Miklos respect each other's independence, and share the same values.
The ending of Nexus is tragic, but there is also a redemptive aspect that made it feel emotionally satisfying. I hope that Alison Morton will find other opportunities to write more Aurelia prequels.
Sunday, July 14, 2019
Death in a Desert Land--Blog Tour Review of Novel With Agatha Christie as a Detective
Death in a Desert Land by Andrew Wilson is the third book in Wilson's mystery series in which mystery author Agatha Christie is an investigator. I applied for the blog tour and received a free copy for review from Stephanie Mendoza of Atria Books, the publisher of this novel.
I have a content warning for those who care about animals. If you strongly object to reading about any incidents of violence against pets, this book isn't for you.
The main reason why I wanted to read this novel is because it begins with Agatha Christie being asked to investigate the death of Gertrude Bell by British intelligence which sent Christie to the archaeological site in Ur located in Iraq. Gertrude Bell was a fascinating woman who was a major factor in shaping the Middle East as we currently know it. For more information, readers should see her Wikipedia article that I've linked. I also knew that Agatha Christie had been to Ur because she met her second husband, archaeologist Max Mallowan, there in 1930. One of her books, Murder in Mesopotamia, was drawn from her experiences in Iraq. So Death in a Desert Land did seem historically feasible as well as being of particular interest to me.
The main focus of the case was on archaeologist Leonard Woolley, his wife Katherine, and events at the Ur excavation. The Woolleys were also real individuals. People may want to research them after finishing this book. Wikipedia articles about them contain serious spoilers that would ruin your experience of reading Death in a Desert Land.
This is a tightly plotted mystery with all the requisite twists and a great deal of suspense. Armchair archaeologists will love all the details about how archaeology was conducted during this period and the environment in which they worked.
A number of the characters are provided with intriguing backgrounds. Determined women are significant to the story line though I wouldn't really consider this a feminist novel. There are valid historical reasons why many women during this period could be primarily motivated by their relationships with men. Agatha Christie, the protagonist, was more independent minded than other women in this book. I felt that the characters were realistically portrayed.
I thought that Death in a Desert Land was a well-written mystery. I also liked the opportunities it gave me to find out more about the real people who appeared in the novel.
Andrew Wilson
photo by Johnny Ring
For more information about Andrew Wilson see his website at https://www.andrewwilsonauthor.co.uk/
I have a content warning for those who care about animals. If you strongly object to reading about any incidents of violence against pets, this book isn't for you.
The main reason why I wanted to read this novel is because it begins with Agatha Christie being asked to investigate the death of Gertrude Bell by British intelligence which sent Christie to the archaeological site in Ur located in Iraq. Gertrude Bell was a fascinating woman who was a major factor in shaping the Middle East as we currently know it. For more information, readers should see her Wikipedia article that I've linked. I also knew that Agatha Christie had been to Ur because she met her second husband, archaeologist Max Mallowan, there in 1930. One of her books, Murder in Mesopotamia, was drawn from her experiences in Iraq. So Death in a Desert Land did seem historically feasible as well as being of particular interest to me.
The main focus of the case was on archaeologist Leonard Woolley, his wife Katherine, and events at the Ur excavation. The Woolleys were also real individuals. People may want to research them after finishing this book. Wikipedia articles about them contain serious spoilers that would ruin your experience of reading Death in a Desert Land.
This is a tightly plotted mystery with all the requisite twists and a great deal of suspense. Armchair archaeologists will love all the details about how archaeology was conducted during this period and the environment in which they worked.
A number of the characters are provided with intriguing backgrounds. Determined women are significant to the story line though I wouldn't really consider this a feminist novel. There are valid historical reasons why many women during this period could be primarily motivated by their relationships with men. Agatha Christie, the protagonist, was more independent minded than other women in this book. I felt that the characters were realistically portrayed.
I thought that Death in a Desert Land was a well-written mystery. I also liked the opportunities it gave me to find out more about the real people who appeared in the novel.
Andrew Wilson
photo by Johnny Ring
For more information about Andrew Wilson see his website at https://www.andrewwilsonauthor.co.uk/
Saturday, May 19, 2018
Burning Fields: Australian Historical Romance Deals With Important Issues
I was approached by author Alli Sinclair to review her latest novel, Burning Fields. My co-blogger Tara had reviewed Alli Sinclair's Luna Tango on this blog here. I was interested in reading about Rosie, Alli Sinclair's independent heroine in Burning Fields. So I requested an ARC which was sent to me by the publisher via Net Galley.
As the novel opens in the post-WWII era, Australian Rosie Stanton has been living on her own in Brisbane and is accustomed to making her own decisions, but harassment at her job has forced her to return to the family farm. I found her situation very relatable from the outset. Other American readers may have a similar reaction since the MeToo movement has increased awareness of workplace harassment.
Rosie brought useful skills to her family, but her father's traditionalism made him unreceptive. Sexist attitudes were pervasive during this period. Rosie had to fight for respect from her father and the surrounding community.
Some wonderful exceptions to the denigration of women were the hero, Tomas Conti, and his family who owned the farm next door to the Stantons. As Italians, they were victims of prejudice mainly resulting from Italy having been an enemy during WWII. Yet Rosie's father had more personal reasons for his animus against Italians. This anti-Italian bigotry was one of the obstacles in the path of HEA for Rosie and Tomas.
Tomas' grandmother, known as Nonna, was an unwavering source of support. She became a friend and mentor for Rosie. Nonna was both strong-minded and wise. I loved Nonna's relationship with the often beleaguered female protagonist.
There were some lovely Italian customs mentioned during the narrative including giving women a mimosa flower on Festa de la Donna which is an Italian holiday celebrating women. For more information, see this article from Italy Magazine on the subject.
I thought that Burning Fields was a beautiful and moving romance. Rosie's feminism and the foregrounding of post-WWII antagonism against immigrants from countries that had been Axis Powers may cause readers to think about these issues.
As the novel opens in the post-WWII era, Australian Rosie Stanton has been living on her own in Brisbane and is accustomed to making her own decisions, but harassment at her job has forced her to return to the family farm. I found her situation very relatable from the outset. Other American readers may have a similar reaction since the MeToo movement has increased awareness of workplace harassment.
Rosie brought useful skills to her family, but her father's traditionalism made him unreceptive. Sexist attitudes were pervasive during this period. Rosie had to fight for respect from her father and the surrounding community.
Some wonderful exceptions to the denigration of women were the hero, Tomas Conti, and his family who owned the farm next door to the Stantons. As Italians, they were victims of prejudice mainly resulting from Italy having been an enemy during WWII. Yet Rosie's father had more personal reasons for his animus against Italians. This anti-Italian bigotry was one of the obstacles in the path of HEA for Rosie and Tomas.
Tomas' grandmother, known as Nonna, was an unwavering source of support. She became a friend and mentor for Rosie. Nonna was both strong-minded and wise. I loved Nonna's relationship with the often beleaguered female protagonist.
There were some lovely Italian customs mentioned during the narrative including giving women a mimosa flower on Festa de la Donna which is an Italian holiday celebrating women. For more information, see this article from Italy Magazine on the subject.
I thought that Burning Fields was a beautiful and moving romance. Rosie's feminism and the foregrounding of post-WWII antagonism against immigrants from countries that had been Axis Powers may cause readers to think about these issues.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




